Comparative Negligence in New York

Comparative Negligence in New York

Comparative Negligence in New York

car accident dented bumperAs we get older, most of us realize that life is rarely black and white. Situations often involve shades of gray — and that is particularly true when it comes to personal injury cases. In many situations, there is not a party who is solely responsible for the accident. That may leave victims of personal injury accidents wondering if they can still recover for their losses.

Under New York law, if you have been injured in an accident, you can recover for your damages — even if you are partially at fault. As a Long Island car accident attorney can explain, under a concept known as comparative negligence, juries can award victims money for their losses, and simply reduce the award by the percentage that they are at fault. Understanding this system can help you make an informed choice when it comes to deciding about how to handle your personal injury case.

What Is Comparative Negligence?

New York is one of thirteen states that follows what is known as the pure comparative negligence rule. Adopted in 1975, this rule holds that the amount of damages that you are able to recover is reduced by the percentage that you are at fault for an accident. It is often used as a defense in personal injury cases to reduce the total amount of money owed by a defendant.

Under this rule, even if you are more than 50% at fault for an accident, you can still recover for your damages. This is in contrast to many states, where if you are 51% or greater responsible for an accident, you cannot recover anything. By comparison, New York’s pure comparative negligence rule is far more favorable than other states modified comparative negligence rule.

Consider a situation where you were involved in a car accident. You were speeding, and texting while driving — but the other driver didn’t yield at the intersection before merging onto the road. Clearly, you were both at fault. Can you still recover?

Let’s assume that you were found to be 51% at fault for the accident, and your damages were assessed at $100,000. If you were in a state that used the modified comparative fault rule, you could not recover at all. In New York, the pure comparative negligence rule means that you could still recover $49,000 ($100,000 less the percentage of your fault, or $51,000).

New York’s pure comparative negligence rule means that even if you are partially or mostly at fault for an accident, you can still recover for your losses. That is why it is important to consult with a Long Island personal injury lawyer if you have been involved in any type of accident. Even if you believe that you were to blame for your injuries, a skilled attorney may be able to make the case that you should be able to recover for at least part of your damages.

How Comparative Negligence Impacts Your Recovery

If you file a personal injury claim against another person for negligence, they may claim that you were at fault for your own injuries. For example, if you slipped and fell on a sidewalk in front of a business, the property owner may say that you were not watching where you were going, and so you were at least partially to blame for your fall.

If a defendant (the person who was sued) asserts comparative negligence as a defense in a personal injury case, then it may impact the total amount of money that you receive if you ultimately prevail at trial. As an experienced Long Island personal injury lawyer can explain, this will happen in three phases at a jury trial:

      1. The jury will determine (by percentage) the fault of each party for the accident;
      2. The jury will calculate the total amount of damages; and
      3. The jury will subtract the percentage of fault from the total amount of damages to arrive at a final damage award.

For example, assume that you were seriously injured in a medical malpractice case. The jury may find that you were partially at fault because you failed to inform the doctor of your prior medical history prior to surgery, and that lack of information was a partial cause of your injuries.

At a trial, a jury will first decide the percentage of fault that you bear as opposed to the doctor: 25% your fault, 75% the doctor’s fault. Next, the jury will determine the total amount of damages: $250,000.

Finally, the jury will take 25% of $250,000 ($62,500) and then subtract it from the total award. This will give you the final award of $187,500.

How a Long Island Personal Injury Lawyer Can Help

While the concept of comparative negligence may seem complicated, the most important takeaway is that if you have been hurt in any type of accident — even if you believe that you are partially at fault — you can likely still recover. Under New York law, injured parties who share the blame for an accident can often still be compensated for their losses with the assistance of an experienced Long Island personal injury lawyer.

If you have been hurt in any type of accident, Siler & Ingber can help. We have recovered over $50 million on behalf of our clients. We believe in aggressively advocating for our clients so that they get the compensation that they deserve.  To learn more or to schedule a free initial consultation with a Long Island car accident attorney contact us today at 1-516-294-2666, or online anytime. We never charge a fee unless we recover money for you.

Share this post



PROMOTION PERIOD: The Siler & Ingber Mineola MegaStar Contest begins on March 20, 2023 at 12:00 am ET and
ends on May 1, 2023 at 11:59 PM ET.

ELIGIBILITY: To be eligible, a MegaStar must be a legal U.S. resident at least 16 years of age as of date of
Nomination. A Mineola MegaStar is defined as a person who lives or works in Mineola and is admired or idealized for their courage, dedication, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. By participating, Entrants agree to be
bound by the official rules. Sponsors reserve the right to verify and determine eligibility in their sole discretion.

TO PARTICIPATE: During the Promotion Period, Siler & Ingber will accept from the members of the public (herein, the “Nominators”) nominations of Eligible Entrants (Mineola Megastars) who live or works in Mineola. Nominations may be entered by visiting and completing the online form and essay submission or by emailing photo and essay to during the Promotion Period to receive one (1) entry. Essay must not exceed 500 words. Acceptable essay formats are word documents or pdf ONLY. Nominations submitted without all required information or after the Promotion Period will be disregarded.
Online submissions must be received by May 1, 2023 at 11:59 PM ET to be eligible. All entries become the exclusive property of Siler & Ingber and will not be acknowledged or returned.

ESSAY: During the promotion period, an Entrant can nominate a Mineola MegaStar for the contest by submitting a
photo and essay. The essay must describe why the individual should be chosen as the award winner, including how the individual demonstrates some or all of the following qualifications:

1) an inspiring example to others by helping make Mineola a better place to live (through volunteerism, extra-curricular actives, special projects, giving back, etc.)

2) going above and beyond to aid a friend, family member, stranger or community in a time of need; and/or

3) love of profession and desire, determination and diligence to help outside of normal job responsibilities. The essay must be in English and no more than 500 words. All information provided must be truthful, accurate and complete. An Entrant cannot nominate more than one Hero.

Submitted Materials: Each essay must satisfy all the following submission requirements the Submission


· The essay must be the original creation of Entrant.

· The essay must not portray any recognizable individual without their prior consent, including consent from the

· Entrant must either own all rights to the essay or otherwise have the right to submit the essay in the contest and to provide the rights to Sage Surfaces as set forth herein.

· The essay must not infringe any third party’s intellectual property rights.

· The essay may not contain illegal, indecent, obscene, pornographic, or sexually explicit content, or otherwise offensive material or inappropriate content such as aberrational behavior, graphic violence, drug abuse, or nudity.

· The essay must not promote bigotry, racism, hatred or harm against any group or individual or discrimination based on race, gender, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age.

· The essay must be non-defamatory and must not invade any third party’s right of privacy or publicity.

· The essay must otherwise be appropriate for publication or broadcast or display on a general interest website.

By submitting an essay, each Entrant represents and warrants that the essay meets all of the submission
requirements and that the distribution, reproduction, display and any other uses of any part of the essay by Siler & Ingber as permitted herein will not infringe any third-party rights. Each Entrant further agrees to indemnify and hold Siler & Ingber harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, liabilities and causes of action of whatsoever nature that are based upon or arise out of any breach by such Entrant of such warranties or representations made by contestant or of these official rules.

By submitting an essay, Entrant grants to Siler & Ingber a non-exclusive, perpetual, world-wide, royalty-free license (and waives all moral rights in and to the essay) to display or otherwise use the essay in connection with this promotion and as set forth herein. If Siler & Ingber determines, in its sole discretion and at any time during the promotion period, that any nomination violates the submission requirements, is otherwise unsuitable, offensive, or in poor taste, or violates these official rules, Siler & Ingber reserves the right to remove and disqualify the essay. Siler & Ingber retains sole
discretion as to whether any nomination satisfies the submission requirements and the official rules.

WINNER SELECTION: For the entry period, a panel of judges will select potential Mineola Megastar finalists based on the compelling nature of the essay based on the criteria set forth herein. Top 5 entries will be announced on May 10, 2023. We will post the top 5 on social media. Final winner announced May 15, 2023. Award Ceremony for Mineola MegaStar will take place on May 19, 2023.

WINNER NOTIFICATION AND RELEASES: We will attempt to notify potential winners via telephone and/or email. If a potential winner: (a) does not respond within 48 hours of initial notification attempt; (b) is not in compliance with these official rules, (c) does not meet the eligibility requirements, (d) declines the prize, he or she will be disqualified, and an alternate winner will be selected by applying the criteria set forth above.
PRIZES: There is 1 Mineola MegaStar. Winner will receive a $500 Cash Prize.

PUBLICITY AND MARKETING: Submission of a nomination in the contest constitutes permission to Siler & Ingber to use Entrants name, identity, title, likeness, distinctive appearance, physical likeness, image, portrait, picture, photograph (whether still or moving), screen persona, voice, vocal style, statements, gesture, mannerism, personality, performance characteristic, biographical data, signature, social media handles and identities, and any other indicia or imitation of identity or likeness for purposes of advertising and trade, in any medium, without further notice, approval, or compensation, unless prohibited by law.

PRIZE RESTRICTIONS: No transfer, assignment, sale, duplication, cash redemption or substitution of Prize (or portion of Prize) is permitted, except by Sponsors, which reserve the right to substitute a Prize (or applicable portion of Prize) with one of comparable or greater value, as determined by Sponsors. Sponsors are not responsible for and will not replace a lost or stolen Prize or any component thereof. All Prize details are at Sponsors’ sole and absolute discretion. Non-compliance with these Official Rules may result in disqualification and, at Sponsors’ sole discretion, the awarding of Prize to an alternate winner.


Do I Have A Case

    Skip to content