Are OSHA’s Increase in Fines Enough to Keep Employee’s Safe?

Are OSHA’s Increase in Fines Enough to Keep Employee’s Safe?

In 2015, OSHA floated an idea concerning its intention to increase its penalties by as much as 80 percent. For advocates who always lamented that the rates then charged by OSHA were too low, this was welcome news. Fast forward to 2018, the current rates makes one realize that OSHA made good of its intention. Previously, willful violation attracted an average penalty of $70,000, the figure goes as high as $127,000 today. The same applies to repeat violations. On the other hand, serious violations attracted a penalty of $7000 on average, the figure today goes as high as $12,000. The pertinent question remains whether these increments actually serve the intended purpose, that of encouraging accident watchfulness by organizations.

A Gap in Current Laws

Judging from the prevalent cases of high OSHA fines imposed, it appears that the organization has failed to achieve the intended goal, that of prompting companies to enhance and ensure the safety of their workers. Partly, this is due to systemic deficiencies in the law, among them being challenges in successfully prosecuting violators, such as those who use ‘ignorance’ defense to negotiate a resolution. However, serious strides have been made in relation to this, more so in the wake of a recent case in Athens, GA, where the Eleventh Circuit court rejected the contractor’s argument against ‘willful’ safety violation, citing that such would preclude classification of a violation as willful, and which might perversely allow contractors to cite ineffective training as defense against serious charges.

New OSHA Fines Significantly Higher

largest-violations

Take, for example, the case of Rynone Manufacturing Corp, that OSHA recently fined a total of $70,078 based on 9 cases of serious violations. While some of these violations attracted fines of $4800 or thereabouts, others attracted fines of up to $11,408, a new high compared to penalties exacted on similar cases over the previous years. The violations cited varied extensively, ranging from hazards created by improper stacking or storing of instruments that could easily tumble, thereby causing physical harm to employees, failure to ensure employee protection from machine injuries, failure to institute a program for regular equipment inspection, as well as failure to accord the necessary safe machine operation training.

Is OSHA a Law Enforcement Agency?

More interesting, however, is the fact that despite OSHA being effectively a law enforcement agency, following the increase in penalty amount, its commitment to fast-track complaints and ensure adherence to set safety rules and guidelines, it still finds it difficult making public the hefty penalties it exacts on different companies across the country. In fact, of the cases currently in the public domain, no more than 20 percent have been through OSHA press releases. Does OSHA perceive such releases as hurtful to the companies or is it just a systemic practice designed to keep information out of the public domain? As a law enforcement agency, it needs to be accountable to the public. Reports on its actions, or inaction, would not be too much for the public to ask.

Use (or Non-Use) of Press Releases

If press releases were an embarrassment to the implicated employers, then logic dictates that such is a good thing since it discourages others against reckless disregard for employee safety. Who pays the price for non-disclosure of information pertaining to activities for which OSHA fines companies massive amounts? Despite OSHA’s reticence concerning the essence of publicizing its enforcement activities, select members of the press have taken it upon themselves to make public what OSHA intends to keep a secret.

Cases exist where media briefings would have gone a long way in educating the masses on some of the ills associated with certain organizational practices. For instance, the case of Aspire of Western New York, recently fined $65,186 by OSHA for safety violations. The firm, which caters to people with disabilities, would have highlighted the level of negligence for which the company was fined. Instead, OSHA chose to keep the details under wraps, thus denying the public vital information.

In a similar breadth, Ream Roofing Associates Inc., NY, which was recently fined $145,382 on two counts of serious violations and one count of willful violation, would have formed a perfect case study on the effectiveness of public engagement and awareness of safety standards under which employees operate. In this case, the company had allegedly failed to secure a temporary wood decking in certain areas of the roof, an accident followed that resulted in the death, from head trauma and bone fracture, of an employee. If OSHA could take the initiative of making these cases public, and subsequently educating the public on proactive, rather than reactionary measures, then such accidents would reduce drastically across states. But OSHA’s disdain for press releases remains charming, even as evidence mounts that it has transformed itself into a law enforcement agency.

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

OFFICIAL RULES

NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN.

PROMOTION PERIOD: The Siler & Ingber Mineola MegaStar Contest begins on March 20, 2023 at 12:00 am ET and
ends on May 1, 2023 at 11:59 PM ET.

ELIGIBILITY: To be eligible, a MegaStar must be a legal U.S. resident at least 16 years of age as of date of
Nomination. A Mineola MegaStar is defined as a person who lives or works in Mineola and is admired or idealized for their courage, dedication, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. By participating, Entrants agree to be
bound by the official rules. Sponsors reserve the right to verify and determine eligibility in their sole discretion.

TO PARTICIPATE: During the Promotion Period, Siler & Ingber will accept from the members of the public (herein, the “Nominators”) nominations of Eligible Entrants (Mineola Megastars) who live or works in Mineola. Nominations may be entered by visiting www.nylawnet.com/mineolamegastar and completing the online form and essay submission or by emailing photo and essay to marketing@nylawnet.com during the Promotion Period to receive one (1) entry. Essay must not exceed 500 words. Acceptable essay formats are word documents or pdf ONLY. Nominations submitted without all required information or after the Promotion Period will be disregarded.
Online submissions must be received by May 1, 2023 at 11:59 PM ET to be eligible. All entries become the exclusive property of Siler & Ingber and will not be acknowledged or returned.

ESSAY: During the promotion period, an Entrant can nominate a Mineola MegaStar for the contest by submitting a
photo and essay. The essay must describe why the individual should be chosen as the award winner, including how the individual demonstrates some or all of the following qualifications:

1) an inspiring example to others by helping make Mineola a better place to live (through volunteerism, extra-curricular actives, special projects, giving back, etc.)

2) going above and beyond to aid a friend, family member, stranger or community in a time of need; and/or

3) love of profession and desire, determination and diligence to help outside of normal job responsibilities. The essay must be in English and no more than 500 words. All information provided must be truthful, accurate and complete. An Entrant cannot nominate more than one Hero.

Submitted Materials: Each essay must satisfy all the following submission requirements the Submission


Requirements:

· The essay must be the original creation of Entrant.

· The essay must not portray any recognizable individual without their prior consent, including consent from the
Hero.

· Entrant must either own all rights to the essay or otherwise have the right to submit the essay in the contest and to provide the rights to Sage Surfaces as set forth herein.

· The essay must not infringe any third party’s intellectual property rights.

· The essay may not contain illegal, indecent, obscene, pornographic, or sexually explicit content, or otherwise offensive material or inappropriate content such as aberrational behavior, graphic violence, drug abuse, or nudity.

· The essay must not promote bigotry, racism, hatred or harm against any group or individual or discrimination based on race, gender, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age.

· The essay must be non-defamatory and must not invade any third party’s right of privacy or publicity.

· The essay must otherwise be appropriate for publication or broadcast or display on a general interest website.

By submitting an essay, each Entrant represents and warrants that the essay meets all of the submission
requirements and that the distribution, reproduction, display and any other uses of any part of the essay by Siler & Ingber as permitted herein will not infringe any third-party rights. Each Entrant further agrees to indemnify and hold Siler & Ingber harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, liabilities and causes of action of whatsoever nature that are based upon or arise out of any breach by such Entrant of such warranties or representations made by contestant or of these official rules.

By submitting an essay, Entrant grants to Siler & Ingber a non-exclusive, perpetual, world-wide, royalty-free license (and waives all moral rights in and to the essay) to display or otherwise use the essay in connection with this promotion and as set forth herein. If Siler & Ingber determines, in its sole discretion and at any time during the promotion period, that any nomination violates the submission requirements, is otherwise unsuitable, offensive, or in poor taste, or violates these official rules, Siler & Ingber reserves the right to remove and disqualify the essay. Siler & Ingber retains sole
discretion as to whether any nomination satisfies the submission requirements and the official rules.

WINNER SELECTION: For the entry period, a panel of judges will select potential Mineola Megastar finalists based on the compelling nature of the essay based on the criteria set forth herein. Top 5 entries will be announced on May 10, 2023. We will post the top 5 on social media. Final winner announced May 15, 2023. Award Ceremony for Mineola MegaStar will take place on May 19, 2023.


WINNER NOTIFICATION AND RELEASES: We will attempt to notify potential winners via telephone and/or email. If a potential winner: (a) does not respond within 48 hours of initial notification attempt; (b) is not in compliance with these official rules, (c) does not meet the eligibility requirements, (d) declines the prize, he or she will be disqualified, and an alternate winner will be selected by applying the criteria set forth above.
PRIZES: There is 1 Mineola MegaStar. Winner will receive a $500 Cash Prize.

PUBLICITY AND MARKETING: Submission of a nomination in the contest constitutes permission to Siler & Ingber to use Entrants name, identity, title, likeness, distinctive appearance, physical likeness, image, portrait, picture, photograph (whether still or moving), screen persona, voice, vocal style, statements, gesture, mannerism, personality, performance characteristic, biographical data, signature, social media handles and identities, and any other indicia or imitation of identity or likeness for purposes of advertising and trade, in any medium, without further notice, approval, or compensation, unless prohibited by law.

PRIZE RESTRICTIONS: No transfer, assignment, sale, duplication, cash redemption or substitution of Prize (or portion of Prize) is permitted, except by Sponsors, which reserve the right to substitute a Prize (or applicable portion of Prize) with one of comparable or greater value, as determined by Sponsors. Sponsors are not responsible for and will not replace a lost or stolen Prize or any component thereof. All Prize details are at Sponsors’ sole and absolute discretion. Non-compliance with these Official Rules may result in disqualification and, at Sponsors’ sole discretion, the awarding of Prize to an alternate winner.

VERIFICATION OF OFFICIAL WINNER: ALL PRIZE WINNERS ARE SUBJECT TO ELIGIBILITY VERIFICATION BY SPONSORS, WHOSE DECISIONS ARE FINAL AND BINDING IN ALL MATTERS RELATED TO THE CONTEST.

Do I Have A Case

    Skip to content