Construction Fatalities in NY

Construction Fatalities in NY

 

A 34-year-old construction worker from the Bronx was killed on a construction site in Queens last month after hitting his head on a low beam. The incident was not only tragic but began raising questions about the safety of the high-rise worksite and the company the worker was employed for. Unfortunately, construction fatalities such as this one are not uncommon, especially in the state of New York.

New York Construction Fatalities Are On The Rise

In a report released by the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH) a record-breaking 71 construction workers died on the job in New York State in 2016, 21 in New York City alone. As more and more families continue to be hit by tragedy, safety advocates around the state are examining what is causing these fatalities and where change is needed most to reduce them.

What’s Causing NY Construction Fatalities?

Over the past five years, New York State has seen a 29.5% increase in construction fatalities according to the NYCOSH. When examining the data, the following variables considerably impacted the number of deaths reported each year:

  • Falling hazards: Construction sites with high rates of falling hazards continue to cause unnecessary deaths throughout the state. Falls have contributed to the death of 218 workers in the last ten years, remaining the number one cause of death in the construction industry.
  • Non-union worksites: Private worksites have higher rates of death and injury than union controlled sites, resulting in 94.7% of construction fatalities in 2016.
  • Underfunded enforcement agencies: Over the past 20 years, OSHA inspections of construction sites have drastically decreased due to underfunding, causing fewer safety inspections and corrections of unsafe construction practices.
  • Low fines for construction companies: OSHA fines for construction companies have actually decreased by 7%, providing less incentive for construction sites to spend money on safety equipment and injury prevention methods.
  • Fraudulent safety training: Some contractors pressure employees to obtain fraudulent safety training cards to avoid paying for safety courses and getting fined by OSHA for not having the certifications on site.

Preventing Construction Fatalities

With such an alarming spike in construction fatalities, doing nothing to change these statistics is not an option New York can afford. A serious overhaul of construction safety practices is needed to ensure employers are held responsible for protecting their employees on the job site at all times. In NYCOSH’s January report, the committee provides several recommendations for how New York State can decrease its high rate of construction deaths and prevent fatal injuries on the job going forward:

  • Requiring adequate safety training for workers: By upping the requirements on safety training and certifications, workers will be more adequately trained in how to prevent construction injuries and deaths. In 2017, New York City enacted rigorous construction safety laws such as requiring 40 hours minimum of safety training, establishing funding streams to ensure employers had access to credible training courses, and increasing the licensing and certifications needed in highly dangerous fields of construction.
  • Extending current safety legislation: Safety legislation such as New York’s Scaffold Safety Law and Carlos’ Law focus on holding building/property owners and employers responsible for worker injuries. Keeping and defending this legislation is extremely important in reducing construction deaths.
  • Crackdown on enforcement and monitoring: Making sure criminal contractors and construction companies are prosecuted and held responsible for unsafe behaviors is essential to protecting workers. The state cannot be lax on revoking licenses and permits for safety violations. NYCOSH also believes directing funding towards more OSHA inspections would be extremely helpful in monitoring issues before deaths occur.
  • Protecting Latino and immigrant workers: Employers must be held accountable for protecting all employees equally. Latino and immigrant workers are less likely to report safety violations in fear of exploitation by employers. Recent spikes in immigration raids have given even more power to crooked employers who willfully violate the health and safety of their Latino and immigrant employees.

New York State Is Behind

New York City has already taken extreme initiatives to fight back against construction fatalities and New York State needs to follow suit. Without revised safety legislation, proper allegations of funding, and stricter regulations on employers, construction deaths will continue to rise across the state causing more families pain and suffering when their loved ones don’t come home from work.

If you’ve been injured in a construction accident due to the negligence of an employer or building owner, call the personal injury experts at Siler & Ingber. Our winning attorneys strongly believe in protecting the rights of workers and will help you seek justice for your injuries. Contact us to schedule a free consultation 1-877-529-4343 or click on the form below.

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

OFFICIAL RULES

NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN.

PROMOTION PERIOD: The Siler & Ingber Mineola MegaStar Contest begins on March 20, 2023 at 12:00 am ET and
ends on May 1, 2023 at 11:59 PM ET.

ELIGIBILITY: To be eligible, a MegaStar must be a legal U.S. resident at least 16 years of age as of date of
Nomination. A Mineola MegaStar is defined as a person who lives or works in Mineola and is admired or idealized for their courage, dedication, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. By participating, Entrants agree to be
bound by the official rules. Sponsors reserve the right to verify and determine eligibility in their sole discretion.

TO PARTICIPATE: During the Promotion Period, Siler & Ingber will accept from the members of the public (herein, the “Nominators”) nominations of Eligible Entrants (Mineola Megastars) who live or works in Mineola. Nominations may be entered by visiting www.nylawnet.com/mineolamegastar and completing the online form and essay submission or by emailing photo and essay to marketing@nylawnet.com during the Promotion Period to receive one (1) entry. Essay must not exceed 500 words. Acceptable essay formats are word documents or pdf ONLY. Nominations submitted without all required information or after the Promotion Period will be disregarded.
Online submissions must be received by May 1, 2023 at 11:59 PM ET to be eligible. All entries become the exclusive property of Siler & Ingber and will not be acknowledged or returned.

ESSAY: During the promotion period, an Entrant can nominate a Mineola MegaStar for the contest by submitting a
photo and essay. The essay must describe why the individual should be chosen as the award winner, including how the individual demonstrates some or all of the following qualifications:

1) an inspiring example to others by helping make Mineola a better place to live (through volunteerism, extra-curricular actives, special projects, giving back, etc.)

2) going above and beyond to aid a friend, family member, stranger or community in a time of need; and/or

3) love of profession and desire, determination and diligence to help outside of normal job responsibilities. The essay must be in English and no more than 500 words. All information provided must be truthful, accurate and complete. An Entrant cannot nominate more than one Hero.

Submitted Materials: Each essay must satisfy all the following submission requirements the Submission


Requirements:

· The essay must be the original creation of Entrant.

· The essay must not portray any recognizable individual without their prior consent, including consent from the
Hero.

· Entrant must either own all rights to the essay or otherwise have the right to submit the essay in the contest and to provide the rights to Sage Surfaces as set forth herein.

· The essay must not infringe any third party’s intellectual property rights.

· The essay may not contain illegal, indecent, obscene, pornographic, or sexually explicit content, or otherwise offensive material or inappropriate content such as aberrational behavior, graphic violence, drug abuse, or nudity.

· The essay must not promote bigotry, racism, hatred or harm against any group or individual or discrimination based on race, gender, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age.

· The essay must be non-defamatory and must not invade any third party’s right of privacy or publicity.

· The essay must otherwise be appropriate for publication or broadcast or display on a general interest website.

By submitting an essay, each Entrant represents and warrants that the essay meets all of the submission
requirements and that the distribution, reproduction, display and any other uses of any part of the essay by Siler & Ingber as permitted herein will not infringe any third-party rights. Each Entrant further agrees to indemnify and hold Siler & Ingber harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, liabilities and causes of action of whatsoever nature that are based upon or arise out of any breach by such Entrant of such warranties or representations made by contestant or of these official rules.

By submitting an essay, Entrant grants to Siler & Ingber a non-exclusive, perpetual, world-wide, royalty-free license (and waives all moral rights in and to the essay) to display or otherwise use the essay in connection with this promotion and as set forth herein. If Siler & Ingber determines, in its sole discretion and at any time during the promotion period, that any nomination violates the submission requirements, is otherwise unsuitable, offensive, or in poor taste, or violates these official rules, Siler & Ingber reserves the right to remove and disqualify the essay. Siler & Ingber retains sole
discretion as to whether any nomination satisfies the submission requirements and the official rules.

WINNER SELECTION: For the entry period, a panel of judges will select potential Mineola Megastar finalists based on the compelling nature of the essay based on the criteria set forth herein. Top 5 entries will be announced on May 10, 2023. We will post the top 5 on social media. Final winner announced May 15, 2023. Award Ceremony for Mineola MegaStar will take place on May 19, 2023.


WINNER NOTIFICATION AND RELEASES: We will attempt to notify potential winners via telephone and/or email. If a potential winner: (a) does not respond within 48 hours of initial notification attempt; (b) is not in compliance with these official rules, (c) does not meet the eligibility requirements, (d) declines the prize, he or she will be disqualified, and an alternate winner will be selected by applying the criteria set forth above.
PRIZES: There is 1 Mineola MegaStar. Winner will receive a $500 Cash Prize.

PUBLICITY AND MARKETING: Submission of a nomination in the contest constitutes permission to Siler & Ingber to use Entrants name, identity, title, likeness, distinctive appearance, physical likeness, image, portrait, picture, photograph (whether still or moving), screen persona, voice, vocal style, statements, gesture, mannerism, personality, performance characteristic, biographical data, signature, social media handles and identities, and any other indicia or imitation of identity or likeness for purposes of advertising and trade, in any medium, without further notice, approval, or compensation, unless prohibited by law.

PRIZE RESTRICTIONS: No transfer, assignment, sale, duplication, cash redemption or substitution of Prize (or portion of Prize) is permitted, except by Sponsors, which reserve the right to substitute a Prize (or applicable portion of Prize) with one of comparable or greater value, as determined by Sponsors. Sponsors are not responsible for and will not replace a lost or stolen Prize or any component thereof. All Prize details are at Sponsors’ sole and absolute discretion. Non-compliance with these Official Rules may result in disqualification and, at Sponsors’ sole discretion, the awarding of Prize to an alternate winner.

VERIFICATION OF OFFICIAL WINNER: ALL PRIZE WINNERS ARE SUBJECT TO ELIGIBILITY VERIFICATION BY SPONSORS, WHOSE DECISIONS ARE FINAL AND BINDING IN ALL MATTERS RELATED TO THE CONTEST.

Do I Have A Case

    Skip to content